Skip to main content

What is planet nine?

 Planet Nine Existence? something is moving Finding something without knowing where to look  is not easy, and if it is not even certain that the thing exists it becomes even morecomplicated.Know it well Michael Brown and Konstantin Batygin,  two astronomers rather convinced that in  the extreme periphery of our solar system  is orbiting, never observed by anyone, a  planet at least twice the size of Earth. For years the two diehards argue that the  existence of this "ninth planet" would help to explain the strange similarities in  the orbits of some objects that orbit in the most remote part of our solar system. So far these are only theories and models of  celestial dynamics, discussed by an astronomical  consensus divided so far equally between enthusiasm and skepticism. So that for a long time  are alternating studies in favor and studies that instead want to demonstrate the inconsistency o...

What is the law of gravitation given by Newton?


When people say that Isaac Newton completely transformed the field of physics, they really aren't kidding.Another of Newton's famous contributions to physics was his understanding of gravity. When Newton was first starting, scientists' concept of gravity was pretty much nonexistent. I mean, they knew that when you dropped something, it fell to the ground, and from careful observation, they knew that planets and moons orbited in a particular way. What they didn't know was that those two concepts were connected. Of course, just like with motion, we now know that there's a lot more to gravity than what Newton could observe. Even so, regarding describing the effects of gravity on the scale of, say, our solar system, Newton's law of universal gravitation is incredibly useful. And it all started with an apple… Probably. 

Odds are, you've been told the story of Newton's apple at some point. The story goes that one day, he was sitting under an apple tree in his mother's garden when an apple fell out of the tree. That's when Newton had his grand realization: Something was pulling that apple down to Earth. And that led to another idea: What if the apple was pulling on Earth, too, but you just couldn't tell, because the effect of the apple's force on Earth was less obvious? A few years later, Newton was sitting in the same garden when he had another stroke of inspiration: What if the same force that pulled the apple to the ground could affect things much farther from Earth's surface -- like the Moon? It was, counterintuitive because the Moon orbits Earth, instead of crashing straight into the ground like an apple that falls off a tree. But Newton realized that the Moon was still being pulled toward Earth -- it was just moving sideways so quickly that it kept missing. That's what kept it in orbit. If gravity was keeping the Moon in orbit, what if it affected the behavior of any two objects --like a planet orbiting the Sun? That's the official version of the story -- the one Newton himself used to tell. Most historians think he was embellishing it at least a little, but they're probably is some truth to it. Whether, or not the thing with the apple actually happened, Newton thought his idea seemed promising. The idea is that gravity might affect everything, including the orbits of other planets and moons. So he started looking for an equation that would accurately describe the way the gravitational force made objects behave --whether it was an apple falling on the ground, or the Moon orbiting Earth. Newton knew that however, this gravitational force worked, it would probably behave like any other net force on an object -- it would be equal to that object's mass, times its acceleration. The mass part was easy enough -- it would just be the mass of the apple or the Moon. It was going to be a little harder to figure out the factors that were affecting the acceleration part of the equation. The first thing Newton realized he'd havedistance. When an object is close to the Earth's surface, like an apple in a tree, gravity makes it accelerate at about 10 meters per second squared. But the Moon has an acceleration that's only about a 3600th of that falling apple. The Moon also happens to be about 60 times as far from the center of Earth as that apple would be --and 60 squared is 3600. So Newton figured that the gravitational force between two objects must get smaller the farther apart they are. More specifically, it must depend on the distance between the two objects squared. Then there was mass. Not the mass of the apple or the Moon -- the mass of the other object involved in the gravitational dance: in this case, Earth. Newton realized that the greater the masses of the two objects pulling on each other, the stronger the gravitational force would be between them. Once he'd considered the distance between two objects, and their masses, Newton had most of his equation for the way gravity behaved: The gravitational force was proportional to the mass of the two objects multiplied together, divided by the square of the distance between them. But it had to be a lot smaller, or else you'd see a force pulling together most everyday objects. Like, that Rubik's cube is staying right where it is instead of being pulled towards me. So the gravitational force between us must be very small. So Newton added a constant to his equation -- a very small number that would make the Gravitational force just a tiny fraction of what you'd calculate otherwise. He called it G.And he called this full equation, F = GMm/r^2, the law of universal gravitation. Newton had no idea what big G number would be, though. He just knew it would be a tiny number, and put the letter G into his equation as a placeholder. About a century later, Henry Cavendish, another British scientist, made careful measurements with some of the most sensitive instruments of the time and figured out that G was equal to about 6.67 * 10^-11 N*m^2/kg^2.So indeed, Newton was right about a big G having to be quite small. But even though he didn't know the exact value of the big G at the time, Newton had enough to establish his law of universal gravitation. He described gravity as a force between any 2 objects and published his equation for calculating that force. Then Newton took things a step further, -- well, technically three steps further. About 50 years earlier, an astronomer named Johannes Kepler had come up with three laws. That described the way orbits worked. And those predictions almost perfectly matched the orbits that astronomers were seeing in the sky. So, Newton knew that his law of universal gravitation had to fit with Kepler's laws. Or he'd have to find some way to explain why Kepler was wrong. Luckily for Newton, his law of gravitation not only fit with Kepler's laws, but He could also use it, in combination with his three laws of motion and calculus, to prove Kepler's laws. According to Kepler, the orbits of the planets were ellipses -- as opposed to circles. --With the Sun at one focus of the ellipse -- one of the two central points used to describe how the ellipse curves. And that's what's known as Kepler's first law, and it applies to any elliptical orbit -- not just those of the planets. Our moon's orbit around Earth is also an ellipse, and Earth is at one focus of that ellipse. Kepler's second law was that if you draw a line from a planet to the sun, it'll always sweep out the same-sized area within a given amount of time. When Earth is at its farthest point from the Sun, for example, during one day, We'll have covered an area that looks like a very long, very thin, kinda-lopsided pizza slice. And when we're at our closest point to the Sun, one day's worth of orbit will sweep. Out an area that's more like a short, fat pizza slice. Kepler's second law tells us that if we measure them both, those two pizza slices will have the same area. His third law is a little more technical, but it's basically an observation aboutWhat happens when you take the longest -- or semimajor -- radius of a planet's orbit? And cube it, then divide that by the period of the planet's orbit, squared. According to Kepler, that ratio should be the same for every single planet --And now we know that it is, almost exactly. For every single planet that orbits our sun, that ratio is either 3.34 or 3.35. And! Newton could explain why the actual, observed orbits in the night sky sometimes deviated very slightly from Kepler's predictions -- for example, by having those slightly different ratios. What Kepler didn't know, and Newton figured out, was that the planets and moons were all pulling on each other, and sometimes, that pull was strong enough to change their orbits just a little bit. There's one more thing we should point out about Newton's law of universal gravitation,

This is that it fits what we expect the equation for a net force to look like, according to Newton.
From Newton's second law of motion, we know that a net force is equal to mass times acceleration.
What the law of universal gravitation is saying, is that when the net force acting on an object
Comes from gravity, the acceleration is equal to the mass of the bigger object -- like Earth. --
divided by the distance between the two objects, times, the big G.So, you know how we've been describing gravitational acceleration at Earth's surface as small g? Well, small g is actually equal to big G, times Earth's mass, divided by Earth's radius, squared....math!
And we can use this equation for gravitational acceleration to help NASA out with a challenge. They're grappling with it right now. We want to send humans to Mars. But we have to make sure that their spacesuits will work properly in Martian gravity. One way that NASA tests spacesuits are by flying astronauts on special planes. --sometimes called Vomit Comets. They fly in arcs that let the spacesuit-testers experience reduced weight -- or none.-- for short periods.

To simulate Martian gravity, the flight plan will need to aim for gravitational acceleration.

You'd experience this if you started hopping around on the surface of Mars. So, what would that acceleration be?  Well, from Newton's law of universal gravitation, we know that the acceleration of stuff at Mars' surface would be equal to big G, times the mass of Mars, divided by Mars' radius squared. We also happen to know Mars' mass and radius already, which ... helps.

So, plugging in the numbers, we can calculate the gravitational acceleration at Mars' surface:

It should be about 3.7 meters per second squared. That's the acceleration you'd experience on Mars, and what the Vomit Comet pilots try to achieve when they fly. --About 38% of the acceleration that you experience when you jump off the ground here on Earth.

So, hundreds of years after Newton's day, NASA is still using his math. Yeah, I would say he was a pretty big deal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Largest Machine in the World is The Large Hadron Collider!!!

The biggest machine in the world is going to restart after three years of shutdown and upgrades. The Large Hadron Collider is the world's largest and highest-energy particle collider. It consists of a 27-kilometer-long ring of superconducting magnets where energetic particlesSmash into each other, leading to spectacular collisions and discoveries. Over the years, LHC has made some spectacular contributions to particle physics.It changed our understanding of the universe with the discovery of Higgs Boson in 2012 and paved the way for the discovery of more than 50 new particles. However, at the end of 2018, LHC was shut down for two years for further upgrades. Although the shutdown was planned for only two years, the ongoing pandemic delayed operations longer than expected. So what can we expect in the upcoming operations of the LHC? How will the biggest particle accelerator shape the future of particle physics? And most importantly, what will be this machine's most important sci...